Text Size

Omidenepag Isopropyl 0.002% versus Latanoprost 0.005% in Open-Angle Glaucoma/Ocular Hypertension: The Randomized Phase III PEONY Trial

Wang T.H.; Aung T.; Lu D.-W.; George R.; Senthil S.; Lu F.; Odani-Kawabata N.; Park K.H.


  • 2024
  • Clinical Ophthalmology
View publication
  • Therapeutic Area

    Glaucoma

  • Categories

    Clinical development

  • Affiliations

    Department of Ophthalmology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore; Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; Department of Ophthalmology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Ophthalmology, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, India; VST Centre for Glaucoma Care, Kallam Anji Reddy Campus, Hyderabad, India; Santen Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Emeryville, CA, United States; Santen Pharmaceuticals, Ltd, Osaka, Japan; Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea

Related Publications

Posterior Ciliary Artery Contraction by Bradykinin Receptor Subtypes and Implications for Retinal Blood Flow Dysfunction

Sharif NA, Ohia SE, Kulkarni-Chitnis M, Okolie A, Chaudhry SD, Njie-Mbye YF


Associations between Clustered Visual Field Progression and Locations of Disc Hemorrhages in Glaucoma: A 3-Year Prospective Study

Akagi T, Fukuchi T, Higashide T, Udagawa S, Ohkubo S, Sugiyama K, Tanihara H, Araie M, Tomita G, Matsumoto C, Tomidokoro A, Hangai M, Kawata H, Inai M, Tanaka Y; SVF Prospector Study Group.


Cost-utility analysis of latanoprost unidose cationic emulsion preservative-free versus latanoprost unidose in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension patients in Spain

Canut MI, García-Feijoo J, Larrosa-Poves JM, López-López F, Pazos M, Espinoza-Cámac N, Oyagüez I, Del Rio T, Rodríguez M.


Can't find what you're looking for?

Contact us

Document number: NP-No product-EMEA-0110
Date of preparation: February 2022